This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Turning extra 6 LANS into "router" like links (UPDATE disconnects in 13-15 minutes loops)

Hey all I just finished up setting up the UTM 9 Home edition and I currently have it up and running with eth0 as the WAN and eth1 as the LAN. However, my motherboard has a total of 8 Ethernet ports (though 2 are being used for WAN and LAN out of the 8 - so 6 Ethernet ports open).

What I would like to do is be able to use those Ethernet ports (eth1-eth7) as a type of "router" switch. In other words, make them like a router has on the back of it where you can hook up more devices to it. I will be hooking them all into a 24 port switch (non-manage) and I would like to be able to unplug one of those eth1-7 plugs and still be able to get onto the internet with the other Ethernet ports as "backup" if possible.

So as an example of the above:

I have eth1 as the LAN and eth2. Both are plugged into the 24 port switch. I also have a PC hooked to that same 24 port switch. The PC has access to the internet and can surf the internet. However, lets say I need to unplug eth1 for a reason but still want the PC to have internet. I am wanting eth2 to take over to continue to feed the PC the internet while eth1 is unplugged.

Hopefully this can be done so I don't waste money buying a motherboard with a lot of extra Ethernet ports! [:)]

Thanks for your time.

David

UPDATE:

Hey all I have decided to track when and how long my current UTM 9 setup is messing up. Here is the flow:

Disconnects internet access (LAN and WIFI) every 13-15 minutes -> Takes about 25-30 seconds to come back -> repeats

It seems to be a constant 13-15min intervals when it disconnects and also a constant 25-30 seconds of nothing before it comes back online.

What setting(s) should I look for in my control panel in order to make sure I don't have a setting disabled or set up incorrectly for this type of issue to happen? Since I am using LAG and the netgear, how can I test to make sure its not the Netgear doing this? Is it the issue with this causing a broadcast storm?

And during the downtown this is what it shows now for the ping:



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • Even if you plug multiple ports into multiple switches to achieve fail-over for one (or more) PC's connected to the switch(es), your switches will need Spanning tree or they will suffer a broadcast storm.
    It's simply not possible with unmanaged "dumb" switches to connect them to each other with multiple connections.

    Managing several Sophos UTMs and Sophos XGs both at work and at some home locations, dedicated to continuously improve IT-security and feeling well helping others with their IT-security challenges.

    Sometimes I post some useful tips on my blog, see blog.pijnappels.eu/category/sophos/ for Sophos related posts.

  • Even if you plug multiple ports into multiple switches to achieve fail-over for one (or more) PC's connected to the switch(es), your switches will need Spanning tree or they will suffer a broadcast storm.
    It's simply not possible with unmanaged "dumb" switches to connect them to each other with multiple connections.


    Alright would a Dell PowerConnect 2724 managed switch do the trick then?
  • Alright would a Dell PowerConnect 2724 managed switch do the trick then?


    From what I quickly read it supports link aggregation and VLAN's, so it will probably also support spanning tree.
    I think however that link aggregation (LAG) is the choice you want; it effectively bundles multiple physical connections to 1 logical connection.

    Managing several Sophos UTMs and Sophos XGs both at work and at some home locations, dedicated to continuously improve IT-security and feeling well helping others with their IT-security challenges.

    Sometimes I post some useful tips on my blog, see blog.pijnappels.eu/category/sophos/ for Sophos related posts.

  • From what I quickly read it supports link aggregation and VLAN's, so it will probably also support spanning tree.
    I think however that link aggregation (LAG) is the choice you want; it effectively bundles multiple physical connections to 1 logical connection.


    Looking around the forums for "Link Aggregation" seem to come up with needing the switch to feature VLANs - is that correct? If so then I would still need a managed switch in order to pull what I want to pull off. If not then please do explain. [:)]
Reply
  • From what I quickly read it supports link aggregation and VLAN's, so it will probably also support spanning tree.
    I think however that link aggregation (LAG) is the choice you want; it effectively bundles multiple physical connections to 1 logical connection.


    Looking around the forums for "Link Aggregation" seem to come up with needing the switch to feature VLANs - is that correct? If so then I would still need a managed switch in order to pull what I want to pull off. If not then please do explain. [:)]
Children
  • Looking around the forums for "Link Aggregation" seem to come up with needing the switch to feature VLANs - is that correct? If so then I would still need a managed switch in order to pull what I want to pull off. If not then please do explain. [:)]


    No, you don't need both. Link aggregation simply bundles multiple interfaces. UTM supports it and if your switch also supports it, I think it is what you want. VLANS are totally different in that they segregate multiple broadcast domains. Hosts in one VLAN cannot communicate with hosts in another unless a router routes traffic between the VLAN's.

    Managing several Sophos UTMs and Sophos XGs both at work and at some home locations, dedicated to continuously improve IT-security and feeling well helping others with their IT-security challenges.

    Sometimes I post some useful tips on my blog, see blog.pijnappels.eu/category/sophos/ for Sophos related posts.