Thread Info
  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 17 replies
  • Subscribers 2 subscribers
  • Views 4271 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

ASG220 CPU usage by reporting

mattrus
Hi All,

I have an issue with my ASG220 running 100% CPU which doesn't seem to be affacting WWW and Email throughput but is making the WebAdmin and user portals a nightmare. 

The device is running current firmware, i've rebooted and also purged the mail log as postgress reporting service seems to be chewing the lion's share of the processor. Attached is a capture of the dashboard and also the offending service, I would apprecaite any assistance anyone can offer,

Cheers,
Matt Browning


This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • 0
    with those stats i would have gone up to a 3x series..or built one myself.  I may be wrong but I'm thinking you are actually at the performance omits of that box...they may be able to tweak some software settings..but if they go down that road it means it's only a matter of time before you'll be getting a higher powered one.

    Owner:  Emmanuel Technology Consulting

    http://etc-md.com

    Former Sophos SG(Astaro) advocate/researcher/Silver Partner

    PfSense w/Suricata, ntopng, 

    Other addons to follow

  • 0 in reply to William Warren
    with those stats i would have gone up to a 3x series..or built one myself.


    I prefer to stick to the manufacture’s recommendations, this becomes beneficial when something goes wrong and you need support. The ASG220 states 75 - 300 users, 400,000 email per hour and 300,000 concurrent connections - this is well beyond what I need for this particular site. I have several other deployments of ASG110’s and software deployments on server hardware running without problems, this seems to be an issue specifically related to a reporting service error or config issue rather than performance.

    However, I'll post if I get a solution via Astaro Support.
  • 0 in reply to mattrus
    I concur with William; a 320 is a better match at that load.  When you add Mail and / or Web filtering that max user count goes down...

    CTO, Convergent Information Security Solutions, LLC

    https://www.convergesecurity.com

    Advice given as posted on this forum does not construe a support relationship or other relationship with Convergent Information Security Solutions, LLC or its subsidiaries.  Use the advice given at your own risk.

Reply
  • 0 in reply to mattrus
    I concur with William; a 320 is a better match at that load.  When you add Mail and / or Web filtering that max user count goes down...

    CTO, Convergent Information Security Solutions, LLC

    https://www.convergesecurity.com

    Advice given as posted on this forum does not construe a support relationship or other relationship with Convergent Information Security Solutions, LLC or its subsidiaries.  Use the advice given at your own risk.

Children
No Data
Cookie Information Banner