Thread Info
  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 9 replies
  • Subscribers 1 subscriber
  • Views 4532 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Interface binding

firebear_01
Hi all,
in V7 i can bind a client-definition to a Interface.
to wich Interface should i bind a definition that is behind a VPN-Tunnel ?
Dont find this in the docs maybe iam not looking right ??

Thanks for any answer
firebear


This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • 0
    I can't find any documentation concerning it.  Ket's hope one of the Astaro engineers drops by...
  • 0 in reply to BAlfson
    Hi,
    if i bind a Hostdefinition to an Interface, the Gateway accepts Packets only comming in that Interface to wich i bound it.
    But IPSec Interfaces are not available for this.

    Firebear
  • 0 in reply to firebear_01
    Thanks, firebear, I commented:
    Does binding a defintion to an interface do anything other than limit the use of the definition? I can't imagine that it ever makes sense to have two such definitions that differ only in name and bound interface, but I don't understand.

    When is it useful to bind a definition to an interface?  Maybe an example of where it wouldn't work if not bound to a particular interface.

    Thanks - Bob
Reply
  • 0 in reply to firebear_01
    Thanks, firebear, I commented:
    Does binding a defintion to an interface do anything other than limit the use of the definition? I can't imagine that it ever makes sense to have two such definitions that differ only in name and bound interface, but I don't understand.

    When is it useful to bind a definition to an interface?  Maybe an example of where it wouldn't work if not bound to a particular interface.

    Thanks - Bob
Children
No Data