This discussion has been locked.

You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Routing

I have a phone network with and subnet of 192.168.102.1 Which is a edgemax router. The UTM at site 1 has a primary subnet of 192.168.2.0. I also have set up a secondary interface on the UTM with 192.168.102.25. I then have that set up to go across our vpn. The UTM at site 2 is 192.168.12.1 and the phone network on ETH3 is 192.168.212.1. My phones at site 2 need to get to the 192.168.102.0 network but it has a default gatway of 192.168.102.1. Since the UTM is 192.168.102.25 I cannot get the traffic to flow. I can ping from site 1 to 2 OK, but Site 2 can not ping beyond the 192.168.102.25. I need to reach the gateway for the 102 network. Can yo help please..

This thread was automatically locked due to age.

Parents

0 MichaelHinkle over 8 years ago

I put the route statement in Standard Static Routes. Is this correct? (See Picture). I can ping both ways but my traffic on my phones are still not flowing.
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
0 MichaelHinkle over 8 years ago in reply to MichaelHinkle
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
0 ToddCooper over 8 years ago in reply to MichaelHinkle

The internal routing is key, this drawing is helpful yet does raise more questions. Let me look this over and come back to you, it looks like you may have some additional VLAN routing and/or segmentation issues. From this drawing there appear to be two paths from the 102.2 phone to the UTM. I'll come back to you with a drawing that reflects my thoughts.
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
0 MichaelHinkle over 8 years ago in reply to ToddCooper

It does appear that way, but the 212 network should never flow though the EdgeMax Routers. I do not have a path set up at the second location on the edgemax for the 212 network as it is not needed. I do have the route set up on the first location just to point it to the 192.168.102.25.
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
0 ToddCooper over 8 years ago in reply to MichaelHinkle

VLANS and VPN.docx

Agreed you aren't bridging so the 212 network won't be defined at the second location. Check out the diagram I uploaded, I've made some assumptions and suggestions compared to your original diagram. My network consists of multiple locations utilizing the same parameters you've outlined. I have UTM's with multiple interfaces for Voice and Data with internal routers connected by Internet based VPNs.
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel

Reply

0 ToddCooper over 8 years ago in reply to MichaelHinkle

VLANS and VPN.docx

Agreed you aren't bridging so the 212 network won't be defined at the second location. Check out the diagram I uploaded, I've made some assumptions and suggestions compared to your original diagram. My network consists of multiple locations utilizing the same parameters you've outlined. I have UTM's with multiple interfaces for Voice and Data with internal routers connected by Internet based VPNs.
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel

Children

0 MichaelHinkle over 8 years ago in reply to ToddCooper

I received your device. I really understand what you are saying on the 192.168.12 network about needing routing switch. On this side I do have multiple interfaces (2) setup for internal and they seem to be passing traffic fine. On this side my default gateway is the UTM so that shouldn't be a problem. My Problem is either routing on the other UTM or some port being blocked.
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
0 ToddCooper over 8 years ago in reply to MichaelHinkle

Let's PM for further discussion.
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel

Routing

Submitted a Tech Support Case lately from the Support Portal?