Thread Info
  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 8 replies
  • Subscribers 2 subscribers
  • Views 3213 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Help..! :mad:

annam
Hi all!
I have a UTM320. i want create default route to internet over eht1:
0.0.0.0/0
int: eth1
or
0.0.0.0/0
gateway 192.168.1.1
but i can't save and receive report: "A default gateway can not be defined here. It can be defined within the definition of the interface UTM 320"
Somebody tell me what happending..? 
Tks..! [:)]


This thread was automatically locked due to age.
  • 0
    Simply do what the error message says [;)]:
    Edit your interface defined on eth1 and set the checkbox "Default gateway"...

    ----------
    Sophos user, admin and reseller.
    Private Setup:

    • XG: HPE DL20 Gen9 (Core i3-7300, 8GB RAM, 120GB SSD) | XG 18.0 (Home License) with: Web Protection, Site-to-Site-VPN (IPSec, RED-Tunnel), Remote Access (SSL, HTML5)
    • UTM: 2 vCPUs, 2GB RAM, 50GB vHDD, 2 vNICs on vServer (KVM) | UTM 9.7 (Home License) with: Email Protection, Webserver Protection, RED-Tunnel (server)
  • 0
    I have another problem:
    I LAG 4port: eth2,3,6,7 and trunk with PowerConnect 7024 allowed vlan all
    I ping from 7024 to address in UTM success. But connect PC to 7024 and asign vlan acc. Ping from PC to 7024 ok, PC ping to UTM320:  Destination host unreachable. 
    Can you tell me that problem..? 
    Thank..!
  • 0 in reply to annam
    You mentioned VLANs. Is the PC in a different subnet than the UTM?
    Then the PowerConnect 7024 has to do proper routing, alternatively the UTM has to be configured for that VLAN.

    ----------
    Sophos user, admin and reseller.
    Private Setup:

    • XG: HPE DL20 Gen9 (Core i3-7300, 8GB RAM, 120GB SSD) | XG 18.0 (Home License) with: Web Protection, Site-to-Site-VPN (IPSec, RED-Tunnel), Remote Access (SSL, HTML5)
    • UTM: 2 vCPUs, 2GB RAM, 50GB vHDD, 2 vNICs on vServer (KVM) | UTM 9.7 (Home License) with: Email Protection, Webserver Protection, RED-Tunnel (server)
  • 0
    Hi Scorpionking!
    UTM and PowerConnect have same Vlans. 7024 had execute: ip routing. 
    PC in Vlan 322 has ip: 10.11.22.10, UTM has IP 10.11.22.20. 
    Can you show me this problem..? 
    Tks.
  • 0
    On 7024 and UTM320 i create: Vlan 311, Vlan 322 - Management, Vlan 316.
    I trunk port-channel 1 on 7024 with lag0 on UTM320. Ping ok.
    But i connect PC to 7024 with IP to be of Vlan 322 and ping to IP of Vlan 322 on UTM320: Destination host unreachable.
    Can you tell me that error..!
    Thanks.
  • 0 in reply to annam
    When you create a Astaro-Vlan Interface the switch port has to be Tagged.

    Astaro user since 2001 - Astaro/Sophos Partner since 2008

  • 0
    Vlan 311 on lag0 (VLAN 311) [10.11.11.20/24
    Vlan 316 on lag0 (VLAN 316) [10.11.16.20/24]
    Vlan 322 on lag0 (VLAN 322) [10.11.22.20/24]
    Is that configure true..?
Cookie Information Banner