This discussion has been locked.

You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

CPU load graph

Hello.

I just read the help file for the CPU load graph and wanted to know if i get the point...
If i have a value of more than one over a long time, than the CPU is to weak?

I have an maxiumum of 1.17 in the 1 minute average and a maxiumum of 0.2 (i think this is what 200.00m means) in the 15 minute average.

Is this a high value? Should i be worried?

What are your values?

And maybe someone knows, why this isn't the percentage graph anymore in v5? What are the advantages?

Thx, TH

This thread was automatically locked due to age.

Parents

0 William Warren over 21 years ago

in theory seeing how many processes are waiting in line due to high cpu load is a better indication of cpu usage than the cpu usage percentage..

In reality(at least for me) it is confusing and i prefer hte cpu percentage usage back.

Frankly even with my cpu usage(in v5) up at 8(which is supposed to be very very bad) i did not notice any degregation of performance in any way(this was in the early v5 version due to big pop3 issues) with the rest of the system. Just my .02
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
0 BarryG over 21 years ago in reply to William Warren

I don't think the averages are working right.

On 5.012, My yearly graph shows a big spike in April, so I understand why the yearly Average is high.

However, the Average is also high (260-300+) on the daily, weekly, and monthly graphs, even though the Max is only 1.39 on the daily.

Seems like the daily Average isn't.

Thanks,
Barry
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
0 Simon Shaw over 21 years ago in reply to BarryG

260-300+ ???
This is CPU load?

It should more be in the 1-10 range....
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
0 BarryG over 21 years ago in reply to Simon Shaw

That was in April.
I think it was from some bug in one of the Release Candidates.

But the daily average still seems wrong.

Thanks,
Barry
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
0 THoehne over 21 years ago in reply to Simon Shaw

I think he means 300.00m, what is like 0.3 in my opinion... (See first thread)
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel

Reply

0 THoehne over 21 years ago in reply to Simon Shaw

I think he means 300.00m, what is like 0.3 in my opinion... (See first thread)
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel

Children

No Data