Thread Info
  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 6 replies
  • Subscribers 2 subscribers
  • Views 863 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

9.101 overwrote 9.100?

UliSa
Hi there,

Since yesterday evening I try to update a cluster of two UTM 220 from 9.005 to 9.1. With the master I succeeded but the slave was on state UP2date for several hours.
Today I factory resetted the slave and tried to update it manually. This was successful with 9.006 but the downloadable file u2d-sys-9.100016-101012.tgz.gpg shows up as 9.101 and generates an error messages like "9.100 was expected but 9.006 is installed" -> up2date failed!
Also, a reconnect of the two results in eternal UP2DATE state of the slave...

Any suggestions how I can get the two nodes on the same firmware?

Thanks a lot,
Uli


This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents Reply Children
  • 0 in reply to UliSa
    There are no stupid questions, only stupid answers... [;)]
    Maybe this helps someone else in the future...

    ----------
    Sophos user, admin and reseller.
    Private Setup:

    • XG: HPE DL20 Gen9 (Core i3-7300, 8GB RAM, 120GB SSD) | XG 18.0 (Home License) with: Web Protection, Site-to-Site-VPN (IPSec, RED-Tunnel), Remote Access (SSL, HTML5)
    • UTM: 2 vCPUs, 2GB RAM, 50GB vHDD, 2 vNICs on vServer (KVM) | UTM 9.7 (Home License) with: Email Protection, Webserver Protection, RED-Tunnel (server)
Cookie Information Banner