Thread Info
  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 4 replies
  • Subscribers 2 subscribers
  • Views 603 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Faster: 1.8ghz Celeron or Dual 500mhz PIII SMP?

Jhaislet
I just picked up a rather low end computer and was wondering which will run ASL 5.2xxx faster? 

A 1.8ghz Celeron (128k L2 cache) w/512MB PC133 SDRAM (Intel 845GM chipset)?
or
A dual 500mhz P3 (256k L2 cache per CPU) w/512MB of PC100 SDRAM (Intel BX440 chipset) & SMP aware kernel?

Both systems would have the same NIC's & HDD.


This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • 0
    What version of Astaro and what features of Astaro are you looking to use?  SMP in Astaro can be flaky but in some situations it is better w SMP than UP.

    Owner:  Emmanuel Technology Consulting

    http://etc-md.com

    Former Sophos SG(Astaro) advocate/researcher/Silver Partner

    PfSense w/Suricata, ntopng, 

    Other addons to follow

  • 0 in reply to William Warren
    [ QUOTE ]
    What version of Astaro and what features of Astaro are you looking to use?  SMP in Astaro can be flaky but in some situations it is better w SMP than UP. 

    [/ QUOTE ]

    v5.2 with HTTP proxy, two subnets (wired & wireless), and two IPSec VPN tunnels, and just a couple rules & filters.
  • 0 in reply to Jhaislet
    A bit of a toss up.  Both will serve you well but the higher clock speed celey wil last a bit longer due to the slightly faster memory subsystem.

    Owner:  Emmanuel Technology Consulting

    http://etc-md.com

    Former Sophos SG(Astaro) advocate/researcher/Silver Partner

    PfSense w/Suricata, ntopng, 

    Other addons to follow

Reply Children
No Data
Cookie Information Banner