Thread Info
  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 3 replies
  • Subscribers 3 subscribers
  • Views 850 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Sophos Offers Hourly Pricing Model For UTM Via AWS

utm_kid
Hello , 

FYI , 

Sophos Offers Industry-First Hourly Pricing Model for UTM to Customers via AWS - MarketWatch



thanks


This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • 0
    Yeah, I guess my question goes to cost-effectiveness and practicality.  Trying to position this approach compared to on-site hosting.

    So, we know that there's no licensing issue involved that prevents firing up an image first in a larger instance and then later in a smaller one?

    Switch-over time: Is it possible to do Hot-Standby with instances of different sizes in order to minimize the downtime involved in switching between the sizes?  I'm fairly certain that it's not possible to add/remove processors or RAM in a running instance.

    Cheers - Bob
Reply
  • 0
    Yeah, I guess my question goes to cost-effectiveness and practicality.  Trying to position this approach compared to on-site hosting.

    So, we know that there's no licensing issue involved that prevents firing up an image first in a larger instance and then later in a smaller one?

    Switch-over time: Is it possible to do Hot-Standby with instances of different sizes in order to minimize the downtime involved in switching between the sizes?  I'm fairly certain that it's not possible to add/remove processors or RAM in a running instance.

    Cheers - Bob
Children
No Data