This discussion has been locked.

You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

High Availability in 4.0

Hi There...

I notice that there are some improvements in ASL 4.0 with High Availability, but the most major problem is has not been fixed. The requirement to dedicate an ethernet port on each machine is not really acceptable, since there is no need for this.

The configurations are sent between interfaces encrypted, so that is not the problem. The hearbeats are not encrypted, but are not really a security problem.

My suggestion would be to allow the use of HA on ANY existing ethernet interface. I can do it on my other linux servers, but not ASL

Darryl

This thread was automatically locked due to age.

Parents

0 emgadmin over 22 years ago

I don't see the problem. Nic are cheap today, so why bother for 2 nics used only for HA? I prefer that the hardware is dedicated to 1 function only, thus being more stable & reliable.
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
0 Darryl Smith over 22 years ago in reply to emgadmin

Well, NIC's are cheap, but most motherboards do not have more than four PCI slots. Four? Why would I be using four PCI slots

1. External Interface
2. DMZ
3. Internal Interface
4. Wireless Interface

I suppose I could put the wireless on the DMZ :-)

Oh, and dual-port PCI network cards are far too expensive...

Darryl
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
0 Abi_01 over 22 years ago in reply to Darryl Smith

I am facing the same problem, finding a motherboard with at least 05 pci slots, this is why

1 External
1 Internal
1 DMZ (Web Server etc)
1 Protected Service network (connceted to dialin server)
1 for HA when I find a motherboard (sinff, sniff)

Cheers,

Abi
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
0 ECKEROTH over 22 years ago in reply to Abi_01

I'm having 7 nics in a 2U high cabinet. Using 3 dual nic's and one one the motherboard [:)]cense...
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
0 Darryl Smith over 22 years ago in reply to ECKEROTH

Throwing hardware at the problem is a work arround, not the solution
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
0 Abi_01 over 22 years ago in reply to Darryl Smith

I agree !! Astaro should think about a more elegant solution to the problem in Version 5.0. Don´t forget Securepoint is working hard to quickly close the gap.....

Cheers,

Abi.
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
0 HTMLSpinnr over 22 years ago in reply to Abi_01

Who needs a dual-port card when the D-Link Quad-port adapters work beautifully (DFE-570TX or DFE-580TX). Uses the tulip driver. Probably hard to find now that they're discountinued.

Or, think outside the box. I recently replaced my quad-port card with a single GigE card (Intel Pro 1000 T desktop adapter works just fine for
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel

Reply

0 HTMLSpinnr over 22 years ago in reply to Abi_01

Who needs a dual-port card when the D-Link Quad-port adapters work beautifully (DFE-570TX or DFE-580TX). Uses the tulip driver. Probably hard to find now that they're discountinued.

Or, think outside the box. I recently replaced my quad-port card with a single GigE card (Intel Pro 1000 T desktop adapter works just fine for
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel

Children

0 DanielC over 22 years ago in reply to HTMLSpinnr

The quad card from DLINK (580) does not work with V4 (problem is confirmed by ASTARO). They promised to solve the problem in future releases.

Daniel
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel