Thread Info
  • State Not Answered
  • +2 person also asked this people also asked this
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 18 replies
  • Subscribers 33 subscribers
  • Views 40469 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Live connections bandwidth not accurate

AhmedMaher

In Current Activities > Live Connections the bandwidth column is not accurate.

As you can see in the attached picture when expanding source IP address 192.168.50.2, it has 2 connections with a total download bandwidth of 50 KB/Sec but it only shows 25 KB/Sec

This give a false indication when I need to find out which host is using more bandwidth



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • 0

    HI AhmedMaher, 

    As per your Bandwidth Consumption on your system its 50MB/Sec . The value shown is an average of each connection . If you can check the session by clicking on the value , it would show 25+25 . Now on your browser it may show 50KBPS , if you could add the sessions it will result to 50KBps . The Downstream neext to the host address is an average download shown . 

    Eg session 1 is downloading 50kbps , session 2 35kbps and session 3 is 15kbps the average would be 33.33kbps . 

  • 0 in reply to Aditya Patel

    live connection page is very poor compared to UTM Flow Monitor.

    Make sure you improve it. Many other vendors have a better live connection windows.

    Thanks

  • 0 in reply to lferrara

    HI Luk , 

    Its true that it does need some improvement as of now this feature is taken from Cyberoam OS, not UTM .  

  • 0 in reply to Aditya Patel

    I'm going to add my vote to changing this as well.

    When trying to troubleshoot a bandwidth issue, this is overly complicated. Simply make the closed/top value a TOTAL of all traffic for the IP address.

    Additionally an option to choose between showing speed in bits per second and bytes per second would be great (considering all connections are always in bits per second, it would make sense to have this consistent - bits for speed, bytes for total data)

     

Reply
  • 0 in reply to Aditya Patel

    I'm going to add my vote to changing this as well.

    When trying to troubleshoot a bandwidth issue, this is overly complicated. Simply make the closed/top value a TOTAL of all traffic for the IP address.

    Additionally an option to choose between showing speed in bits per second and bytes per second would be great (considering all connections are always in bits per second, it would make sense to have this consistent - bits for speed, bytes for total data)

     

Children