There hasn't been a lot of talk in the roadmap discussion about the implementation of IPv6 DHCP-PD support on the XG platform. Can we expect to see that at some point in the near future?
This thread was automatically locked due to age.
There hasn't been a lot of talk in the roadmap discussion about the implementation of IPv6 DHCP-PD support on the XG platform. Can we expect to see that at some point in the near future?
Hi Todd,
Good question. There is no specific immediate plans, as we already support DHCP v6.
Thanks
Sachin Gurung
Sachin Gurung
Team Lead | Sophos Technical Support
Knowledge Base | @SophosSupport | Video tutorials
Remember to like a post. If a post (on a question thread) solves your question use the 'This helped me' link.
there are countless requests for dhcp -pd.. Most business class ISP (Timewarner, Comcast) use DHCP-pd to hand out v6 addresses so you not supporting that feature means we can not use native v6 . this was a feature of utm9 so why not migrate it over? the way v6 is implemented now makes it as useful as a sack of shit.
I would consider the ability to obtain IP addressing basic functionality, but what do I know. As mentioned, DHCP-PD client is in UTM, even if it can't send a "hint" to request more than a /64.
Anyway, the XG workaround I'm doing is to have a router (MikroTik) get the IPv6 addressing (DHCP-PD) and then place XG immediately behind it, in bridge mode. This will give you the essential functions of Web Filter, Application Filter, IPS, etc. for both IPv4 and IPv6.
I would consider the ability to obtain IP addressing basic functionality, but what do I know. As mentioned, DHCP-PD client is in UTM, even if it can't send a "hint" to request more than a /64.
Anyway, the XG workaround I'm doing is to have a router (MikroTik) get the IPv6 addressing (DHCP-PD) and then place XG immediately behind it, in bridge mode. This will give you the essential functions of Web Filter, Application Filter, IPS, etc. for both IPv4 and IPv6.