There hasn't been a lot of talk in the roadmap discussion about the implementation of IPv6 DHCP-PD support on the XG platform. Can we expect to see that at some point in the near future?
This thread was automatically locked due to age.
There hasn't been a lot of talk in the roadmap discussion about the implementation of IPv6 DHCP-PD support on the XG platform. Can we expect to see that at some point in the near future?
There is a major difference between DHCPv6 used for addressing an interface and DHCP-PD. DHCP-PD is the normal means for which PA (Provider Allocated) addressed network obtains its prefix. As in a network that does not have its own IP space.
Comcast uses DHCP-PD for both its residential and business cable service to allocate IP space to the end network.
As a gateway device, you need to support acting as a PD client as well as a PD server that can use the prefix obtained as a client in sub-delegations.
2016...
Hi Todd,
Good question. There is no specific immediate plans, as we already support DHCP v6.
Thanks
Sachin Gurung
Sachin Gurung
Team Lead | Sophos Technical Support
Knowledge Base | @SophosSupport | Video tutorials
Remember to like a post. If a post (on a question thread) solves your question use the 'This helped me' link.
there are countless requests for dhcp -pd.. Most business class ISP (Timewarner, Comcast) use DHCP-pd to hand out v6 addresses so you not supporting that feature means we can not use native v6 . this was a feature of utm9 so why not migrate it over? the way v6 is implemented now makes it as useful as a sack of shit.
there are countless requests for dhcp -pd.. Most business class ISP (Timewarner, Comcast) use DHCP-pd to hand out v6 addresses so you not supporting that feature means we can not use native v6 . this was a feature of utm9 so why not migrate it over? the way v6 is implemented now makes it as useful as a sack of shit.
I would consider the ability to obtain IP addressing basic functionality, but what do I know. As mentioned, DHCP-PD client is in UTM, even if it can't send a "hint" to request more than a /64.
Anyway, the XG workaround I'm doing is to have a router (MikroTik) get the IPv6 addressing (DHCP-PD) and then place XG immediately behind it, in bridge mode. This will give you the essential functions of Web Filter, Application Filter, IPS, etc. for both IPv4 and IPv6.