Guest User!

You are not Sophos Staff.

Thread Info
  • State Suggested Answer
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 19 replies
  • Answers 1 answer
  • Subscribers 29 subscribers
  • Views 1174 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Disapointed by XGS 116 for home

Jeff Dufey

I tested a VM with XG home Edition and I was pretty happy with it that I decided to order a physical firewall to get a real protection instead of virtual.

I ordered a XGS 116 and I got really disapointed by the noize of the device. I plug the device in the ground floor and I can hear the high frequences fan noise even in my living room at the first floor. I get surprise when I upgraded to the latest firmware (19OS) that I still got 3 free update and after  that I must order support which is a good price.I also realized that I have no licenses for IPS and this costs like 600.- per year.

I feel like this firewall was way to big for home usage and I will asks for a refund.

I checked on the web and it looks like the XGS 87 also have a lot of big noise feedback regarding the size of the box. Is it the same regarding the licenses as additional?

Is there a way to have a fanless device with XG Home Edition instead of having to sell my car just to have a good performant firewall?



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • 0

    Most likely you should look into a Hypervisor (like KVM etc.) and use there Hardware support to implement SFOS. 

    __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

  • 0 in reply to LuCar Toni

    That way he can use any of the newer devices which have the latest i225/i226 NICs and faster CPUs?

  • 0 in reply to alan weir

    Likely yes. Because if the hypervisor supports your hardware, which they likely do, they can visualizer the hardware for there Host system.

    You can potentially loose some performance, but overall, it is a better approach to most of those integrations. But it will increase the complexity in your system, so it could be an extra layer of configuration. 

    __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

  • 0 in reply to LuCar Toni

    Sophos provides a quick tutorial on installing the XG in KVM and ESXi, but not Proxmox. Since proxmox is so popular these days it would be nice if there was an official guide for it too. It's kind of odd that there is no guide from Sophos.

Reply Children
No Data
Unfiltered HTML