On top of it showing the WAN as down, its always showing 25% packet loss. WHereas if I connect my laptop directly to the ISP router, the is no packet drop.
This thread was automatically locked due to age.
On top of it showing the WAN as down, its always showing 25% packet loss. WHereas if I connect my laptop directly to the ISP router, the is no packet drop.
Maybe there is an MTU size problem or a Speed negotiation problem with that interface and the fiber modems?
Mit freundlichem Gruß, best regards from Germany,
Philipp Rusch
New Vision GmbH, Germany
Sophos Silver-Partner
If a post solves your question please use the 'Verify Answer' button.
Please check each address you are using to test, try using the ip address of each interface as the fail test network. Please post a copy of the wan link manager settings.
ian
XG115W - v19.5.1 mr-1 - Home
If a post solves your question please use the 'Verify Answer' button.
When i try to add another condition, I get the following error:
So you have an ISP router in front of your XG on this interface. Has the ISP performed a firmware/reset upgrade on the router which is blocking the ICMP traffic from your firewall?
Ian
XG115W - v19.5.1 mr-1 - Home
If a post solves your question please use the 'Verify Answer' button.
No, no update to the ISP router. If i directly connect to the Router via my mobile/other laptop via lan to check the connection the internet is working fine.
Also, i would mainly want to know why its not allowing me tk change the IP in the WAN link manager. Is there some config inconsistency at the backend?
No, no update to the ISP router. If i directly connect to the Router via my mobile/other laptop via lan to check the connection the internet is working fine.
Also, i would mainly want to know why its not allowing me tk change the IP in the WAN link manager. Is there some config inconsistency at the backend?
Hello Advait,
For the issue related to "Gateway failover rule couldn't be updated" you might be affected by NC-109120
As Rfcat mentioned, create a case and mention the NC above.
Regards,