HTTP/S bookmarks retiring

Am I the only that uses HTTP/S bookmarks and don't know what to do after they'll be removed?

No. We also use it because our production application server uses the old version of Apache and we can not put it in the world. However, the module implemented in XG Firewall works much worse than in the old CyberoamOS and has significant functional limitations. For example, javascript  does not work. This is the only reason why one of our routers is still running on the old CyberOS firmware.
Personally, I am very surprised that instead of gradually adding and developing new functionalities, SFOS collapses ...

I'm happy that I've tested it before start selling it to my customers!
I will definitely look for another product to resell!

Hi,

to be honest, i never saw a customer using this Bookmark. They instead using the WAF, which is more likely the better approach to protect a HTTPs Site. 

I've used it in the past to give a vendors access to RDP or web apps inside our network without having to give them VPN access.  It was convenient and worked well enough, but having said that, I can't say I'll miss it.  I understand others may not feel that way however.  

Bookmarks still persist, only the HTTP/s Bookmarks will be replaced. 

So RDP etc.

And as far as i know, you should be able to nearly complete every task with WAF. 

LuCar Toni said:

Bookmarks still persist, only the HTTP/s Bookmarks will be replaced. 

So RDP etc.

And as far as i know, you should be able to nearly complete every task with WAF. 

 

You would need Webserver Protection.

As HTML5 Bookmarks would need Network Protection.

Will I be able to use WAF to secure access to an unprotected http service with the ssl certificate and give it only to selected users - as I can do with http bookmarks?

Will I be able to use WAF to secure access to an unprotected http service with the ssl certificate and give it only to selected users - as I can do with http bookmarks?