Thread Info
  • State Not Answered
  • +3 person also asked this people also asked this
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 18 replies
  • Subscribers 34 subscribers
  • Views 20489 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

HTTP/S bookmarks retiring

Andre_x

Hi,
On my XG125 I see this message since the last update:

Retiring HTTP/S bookmarks in the next major feature release. Use web server protection rules as an alternative.

I use those bookmarks to access internal web servers from the portal, how can I achieve this without HTTP/S bookmarks?
How can I dismiss this warning?
Thanks!
Andrea



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • 0

    Am I the only that uses HTTP/S bookmarks and don't know what to do after they'll be removed?

  • 0 in reply to Andre_x

    No. We also use it because our production application server uses the old version of Apache and we can not put it in the world. However, the module implemented in XG Firewall works much worse than in the old CyberoamOS and has significant functional limitations. For example, javascript  does not work. This is the only reason why one of our routers is still running on the old CyberOS firmware.
    Personally, I am very surprised that instead of gradually adding and developing new functionalities, SFOS collapses ...

  • 0 in reply to MichalKawecki

    I'm happy that I've tested it before start selling it to my customers!
    I will definitely look for another product to resell!

  • 0 in reply to Andre_x

    Hi,

    to be honest, i never saw a customer using this Bookmark. They instead using the WAF, which is more likely the better approach to protect a HTTPs Site. 

    __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

  • 0 in reply to LuCar Toni

    I've used it in the past to give a vendors access to RDP or web apps inside our network without having to give them VPN access.  It was convenient and worked well enough, but having said that, I can't say I'll miss it.  I understand others may not feel that way however.  

Reply
  • 0 in reply to LuCar Toni

    I've used it in the past to give a vendors access to RDP or web apps inside our network without having to give them VPN access.  It was convenient and worked well enough, but having said that, I can't say I'll miss it.  I understand others may not feel that way however.  

Children
Cookie Information Banner