Thread Info
  • State Suggested Answer
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 4 replies
  • Answers 1 answer
  • Subscribers 29 subscribers
  • Views 5550 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

utm 9 Migration to XG

KevinNadin

Hello,

 

Two questions:

1. Is there a migration tool for migrating rules from UTM9 to XG?

2. We origially were on XG and down graded to UTM 9 becase the XG platform had a lot of issues, that was 2 years ago. Any opinions on the XG platform now? 

Thanks,

Kevin



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • 0

    KevinNadin said:

    Any opinions on the XG platform now? 

     

    That's a loaded question around here [:D]

    My general observation is legacy UTM people hate XG.  People from other platforms vary in their opinion.  I come from Microsoft ISA/TMG and Cisco Meraki background and I think XG is generally a good product and I like it (logically its organized a lot like ISA/TMG was, and its vastly more powerful than Cisco Meraki MX firewalls).  I admit there are some rather baffling things missing (no DHCPv6-PD support, no anti-port scan, etc), and I think almost everyone would agree that the IPSec woes in v17 have been a disaster, luckily for me I moved from IPSec to RED before v17 came out.  

    In short, I recommend it to people, but be prepared for the occasional head scratcher.

Reply
  • 0

    KevinNadin said:

    Any opinions on the XG platform now? 

     

    That's a loaded question around here [:D]

    My general observation is legacy UTM people hate XG.  People from other platforms vary in their opinion.  I come from Microsoft ISA/TMG and Cisco Meraki background and I think XG is generally a good product and I like it (logically its organized a lot like ISA/TMG was, and its vastly more powerful than Cisco Meraki MX firewalls).  I admit there are some rather baffling things missing (no DHCPv6-PD support, no anti-port scan, etc), and I think almost everyone would agree that the IPSec woes in v17 have been a disaster, luckily for me I moved from IPSec to RED before v17 came out.  

    In short, I recommend it to people, but be prepared for the occasional head scratcher.

Children
No Data