Had SFOS v17 MR5 running with 5 IPSEC tunnels, a disaster!
Support was looking at it for several days, no responses, then MR6 came and they wrote me promptly to install...but the issues reoccured, now I got 3 mails stating that their senor dev team is looking at it, but I lost my patience, and i had to move on with UTM, now all tunnels are stable.
MR6 has been put behind UTM for futher testing.
I know the dev. guys are doing their finest, but it's difficult when customers are being told the XG it the way to go, and i keep saying the opposite! - XG will make it eventually, but no customer can be a "beta" tester [:D]
Waiting for a "full backed" solution, as it look's promising!
Just to follow up. Since MR-6 all our devices connected via ethernet hand off so far(knock on wood) have not had any IPSEC issues since applying MR-5 with ipsec fix or with MR-6. The one device we have on a DSL modem with MR-6 connected via PPPoE had an issue getting VPN re-connected after the PPPoE session went down and then came back up briefly this morning. (This has not happened since before MR-5.)
Just to follow up. Since MR-6 all our devices connected via ethernet hand off so far(knock on wood) have not had any IPSEC issues since applying MR-5 with ipsec fix or with MR-6. The one device we have on a DSL modem with MR-6 connected via PPPoE had an issue getting VPN re-connected after the PPPoE session went down and then came back up briefly this morning. (This has not happened since before MR-5.)
