This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Anyone seen MR6?

Hi folks,

just wondering out aloud, has anyone seen MR6?

Thank you

Ian



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents Reply Children
  • I read the release notes which showed lots of fixes, has anyone seen any of the fixes actually working?

    Ian

  • Ian,

    90% of the fixes coming into MR6 are for IPSec component. I will upgrade a XG210 next week on a customer sites who has IPSec.

  • Had SFOS v17 MR5 running with 5 IPSEC tunnels, a disaster!

     

    Support was looking at it for several days, no responses, then MR6 came and they wrote me promptly to install...but the issues reoccured, now I got 3 mails stating that their senor dev team is looking at it, but I lost my patience, and i had to move on with UTM, now all tunnels are stable.

    MR6 has been put behind UTM for futher testing.

    I know the dev. guys are doing their finest, but it's difficult when customers are being told the XG it the way to go, and i keep saying the opposite! - XG will make it eventually, but no customer can be a "beta" tester [:D]

    Waiting for a "full backed" solution, as it look's promising!

  • Just to follow up.  Since MR-6  all our devices connected via ethernet hand off so far(knock on wood) have not had any IPSEC issues since applying MR-5 with ipsec fix or with MR-6.  The one device we have on a  DSL modem with MR-6 connected via PPPoE had an issue getting VPN re-connected after the PPPoE session went down and then came back up briefly this morning. (This has not happened since before MR-5.)

     

    -Scott