Thread Info
  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 10 replies
  • Subscribers 1 subscriber
  • Views 24849 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Testing "Inappropriate Website Control"

IanL

OK, have SEC 5 and SEP 10 installed on all PC's on the LAN.

All have updated today and all are reflecting that they are compliant with all the Policies.

The Policy for Web Control is enabled and set to "Inappropriate Website Control" and uses the default settings. (It's a clone of the supplied default policy).

So now to test. On one of the PCs on the LAN, I browse using FireFox or IE8 to several known sites that would instigate a BLOCK (Some Web Proxies and one PORN site).

No effect on the PC, it can access the sites with no trouble and no web events are registered in EC 5.

What am I doing wrong?

:19553


This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • 0

    Thanks for all the input to my original question. It now seems that you need to be licenced for an Enterprise Account before Web control will become part of the subscription. Sadly we were not informed about this before we upgraded for two years and therefore will have to implement a third party solution. Even the Sohpos Support guy was confused about all the options.

    Why can't people make things clear when they advertise something? :smileymad:

    :20411
Reply
  • 0

    Thanks for all the input to my original question. It now seems that you need to be licenced for an Enterprise Account before Web control will become part of the subscription. Sadly we were not informed about this before we upgraded for two years and therefore will have to implement a third party solution. Even the Sohpos Support guy was confused about all the options.

    Why can't people make things clear when they advertise something? :smileymad:

    :20411
Children
No Data