Guest User!

You are not Sophos Staff.

Thread Info
  • State Verified Answer
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 3 replies
  • Subscribers 0 subscribers
  • Views 8648 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

ES1100 features

Azwan

Hi All,

Currently im running 1 POC for 1 unit Sophos ES1100 email appliance, below are question raised by customer regarding email appliance feature.

Appreciate if anyone can provide suggestion or guide regarding features as required by customer. Thanks

  1. How to open the attachments of the quarantine mails?
  2. Create/configured to copy every email that go through email appliance?
  3. Copy every mail to external/server so that we will have another copy of the mail?
:20079


This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • 0

    Tom,

    I know this is an old post.  But you mentioned the "Additional Policy" process after Anti-Virus but before the SPAM test.  What is the thought process behind that design?

    I have wondered why that was but didn't know.  I figured Anti-Virus and Anti-SPAM would process before other policies.  I would think creating Additional Policies would be 3rd or after in line.

    My thoughts would be the "Additional Policies" running prior to Anti-SPAM would be processing, catching, quarantining emails that would otherwise be identified as SPAM and having to sort through it.

    Seems backwards to me but that but that is because I don't understand the logic behind letting Additional Policies take precedence like that.

    Seems like that Additional Policies would process afterward depending on what you are doing with Additional Policies.

    Seems like it would make the Anti-SPAM less effective.

    What is the thought, logic and design process behind why Additional Policies are ran this way.

    Thanks!

    :28167
Reply
  • 0

    Tom,

    I know this is an old post.  But you mentioned the "Additional Policy" process after Anti-Virus but before the SPAM test.  What is the thought process behind that design?

    I have wondered why that was but didn't know.  I figured Anti-Virus and Anti-SPAM would process before other policies.  I would think creating Additional Policies would be 3rd or after in line.

    My thoughts would be the "Additional Policies" running prior to Anti-SPAM would be processing, catching, quarantining emails that would otherwise be identified as SPAM and having to sort through it.

    Seems backwards to me but that but that is because I don't understand the logic behind letting Additional Policies take precedence like that.

    Seems like that Additional Policies would process afterward depending on what you are doing with Additional Policies.

    Seems like it would make the Anti-SPAM less effective.

    What is the thought, logic and design process behind why Additional Policies are ran this way.

    Thanks!

    :28167
Children
No Data