Thread Info
  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 8 replies
  • Subscribers 1 subscriber
  • Views 3529 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Web Caching: Possible to use RAM instead of Data Disk?

AmigoHD
The web caching option for static content is very useful but slow. I can see storage space getting smaller on the Data Disk partition, so I am guessing it's storing the cache to disk. Is there a way to use RAM instead of the slow disk? I am using UTM 9.2 on ESXi with plenty of free RAM available for the UTM.


This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • 0
    The caching isn't controllable.  The web proxy does some ram caching but mainly of the content lookups though.  The Samsungs are good ssd's.  Stick with non-web caching.  I bet your cache hit rate was less than 10-25% anyway..[:)]  What else is on those ssd's in terms of what else is the host running besides the UTM?

    Owner:  Emmanuel Technology Consulting

    http://etc-md.com

    Former Sophos SG(Astaro) advocate/researcher/Silver Partner

    PfSense w/Suricata, ntopng, 

    Other addons to follow

Reply
  • 0
    The caching isn't controllable.  The web proxy does some ram caching but mainly of the content lookups though.  The Samsungs are good ssd's.  Stick with non-web caching.  I bet your cache hit rate was less than 10-25% anyway..[:)]  What else is on those ssd's in terms of what else is the host running besides the UTM?

    Owner:  Emmanuel Technology Consulting

    http://etc-md.com

    Former Sophos SG(Astaro) advocate/researcher/Silver Partner

    PfSense w/Suricata, ntopng, 

    Other addons to follow

Children
No Data
Cookie Information Banner