Guest User!

You are not Sophos Staff.

Thread Info
  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 7 replies
  • Subscribers 1 subscriber
  • Views 3915 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Packet already has AFC mark value

ulfthomas
Hi.

I'm seeing this message every few seconds when connected to my Sophos UTM via L2TP. I've looked around but so far I have been unable to find any resolutions or explanations.

I'm running Sophos UTM 9.201 home edition virtualized on ESX 4.1. Any insights? 


2014:04:30-13:52:08 router afcd[5663]: WARNING! packet already has AFC mark value (0x00007106), replacing with 0x0000207c

2014:04:30-13:52:14 router afcd[5663]: WARNING! packet already has AFC mark value (0x00007106), replacing with 0x0000207c

2014:04:30-13:52:45 router afcd[5663]: WARNING! packet already has AFC mark value (0x00007106), replacing with 0x0000207c

2014:04:30-13:53:05 router afcd[5663]: WARNING! packet already has AFC mark value (0x00007106), replacing with 0x0000207c

2014:04:30-13:53:05 router afcd[5663]: WARNING! packet already has AFC mark value (0x00007106), replacing with 0x0000207c

2014:04:30-13:53:05 router afcd[5663]: WARNING! packet already has AFC mark value (0x00007106), replacing with 0x0000207c

2014:04:30-13:53:15 router afcd[5663]: WARNING! packet already has AFC mark value (0x00007106), replacing with 0x0000207c

2014:04:30-13:53:17 router afcd[5663]: WARNING! packet already has AFC mark value (0x00007106), replacing with 0x0000207c

2014:04:30-13:53:27 router afcd[5663]: WARNING! packet already has AFC mark value (0x00007106), replacing with 0x0000207c


Regards,

Thomas


This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • 0
    mlenk,

    No, I do not know about any specific issue (aside from my proxy performance issues in another post which I have gotten input on how to resolve).

    I do however question this logging because if it is normal behavior than it will fill my logs unnecessarily. Is there any way to suppress it? 

    Regards,

    Thomas
Reply
  • 0
    mlenk,

    No, I do not know about any specific issue (aside from my proxy performance issues in another post which I have gotten input on how to resolve).

    I do however question this logging because if it is normal behavior than it will fill my logs unnecessarily. Is there any way to suppress it? 

    Regards,

    Thomas
Children
No Data
Share Feedback
×

Submitted a Tech Support Case lately from the Support Portal?