Thread Info
  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 16 replies
  • Subscribers 1 subscriber
  • Views 5362 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Problem with Cobion Surf Protection II

AliIsmail
Still I have the same problem, the new patch does not work either.

I am thinking of having the Cobion DB in local which will:
1. It will save my problem.
2. It will not eat something from the bandwdith.

Regards


This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents Reply Children
  • 0 in reply to NimmdirKeks
    Yeah, it would be too big for any IDE drive out there... think SAN....  [:)]

    CTO, Convergent Information Security Solutions, LLC

    https://www.convergesecurity.com

    Advice given as posted on this forum does not construe a support relationship or other relationship with Convergent Information Security Solutions, LLC or its subsidiaries.  Use the advice given at your own risk.

  • 0 in reply to NimmdirKeks
    Hello Friends,

    Well I have an 80GB, it seems that about 70 GB is free now.

    So you mean it is possible BUT require a huge size of the harddisk. If yes, I may ask you for only the spyware sites DB or the nudity sites DB.

    Hearing from you soon.
  • 0 in reply to AliIsmail
    I'm still having problems with it too... logs indicate cobion connection is timing out.. I've started service ticket with Astaro.. we'll see where this goes.. I'm running 6.102.

    CTO, Convergent Information Security Solutions, LLC

    https://www.convergesecurity.com

    Advice given as posted on this forum does not construe a support relationship or other relationship with Convergent Information Security Solutions, LLC or its subsidiaries.  Use the advice given at your own risk.

  • 0 in reply to BrucekConvergent
    Dear Friend,

    Please make sure that you have a public (real) IP in your WAN side, since the new patch works only with public IP not with Private IP.

    Feel free to chat together through Yahoo "eng_ali1979" or MSN "wee_aliismail@hotmail.com"

    Hope to hear a good news.
  • 0 in reply to AliIsmail
    Why does it only work if you have a public IP on the Wan side.  I have my web filtering done internally so that isn't a possibility for me and I'm still having problems with poor performance going through the web proxy.  I wish I could go back to Version 4 where it was simpler and more efficient.  Never had this much trouble with the proxy on ver4.
  • 0 in reply to AliIsmail
    I have 32 static IPs, all public, on a T1 connection.  Astaro support is working with me on this issue now.

    CTO, Convergent Information Security Solutions, LLC

    https://www.convergesecurity.com

    Advice given as posted on this forum does not construe a support relationship or other relationship with Convergent Information Security Solutions, LLC or its subsidiaries.  Use the advice given at your own risk.

  • 0 in reply to AliIsmail
    We are using a multi-home router in front of the firewall which is doing the NAT, no way to put a official ip address on the internet interface. 
    why ist this a problem for the surf protection.....

    Regards, Lars
  • 0 in reply to lplanz
    We should, at least, be able to have the option to house the Cobian DB locally.  Other surf protection software/appliances offers it.  The performance hit we take referrencing an offisite DB is too much.
  • 0 in reply to 5150
    The performance hit would be nearly the same or even higher, when you house it local. Its the query that takes the time, not the transport via the network. Transfer is at an average of 2 x 200ms, that is not even half a second.
    Even from singapore, I never get a worse connection than 230ms. 

    Chris
  • 0 in reply to NimmdirKeks
    I can possible buy nearly the same but higher is obsurd.  You mean to tell me that referencing a DB offsite would be faster than if it stayed on your network.  No matter how fast your connection is, that is just not true. Some may not have as good of performance connecting to the DB as you do.  My point is to give the user the choice and choose which one would best suit your individual network.