SSLVPN Split Tunnel DNS problem

Is the SSL-VPN pool network allowed to use the UTMs DNS service?

With correctly configured DNS request routing in the UTM internal ressources should be resolvable over their FQDN.

Yes,  SSLVPN Pool is allowed to use the UTM's DNS service. 

I have deployed well over 20 UTM firewalls, and none of them can do the split tunneling properly.

There has to be something that I'm missing.

What exactly are your "local resources"? Are they also FQDN names or are they netbios names?

Perhaps you need to take a look at the DNS suffix, but without any more information it's hard to point in the right direction.

The local resources are web servers that host applications in my office.  My office pc is joined to an AD domain, all internal websites resolve correctly to the internal IP via FQDN. 

Once I connect to my VPN, it bypasses my local DNS servers and tries to send ALL dns requests over the VPN causing an external lookup for an internal server.

Everything resolves fine via IP address on both local and remote but hostname resolution is what gives me an issue depending on what I set for DNS in the advanced tab.

Just to rule out my configuration.. Here's pictures of how its configured.

The local resources are web servers that host applications in my office.  My office pc is joined to an AD domain, all internal websites resolve correctly to the internal IP via FQDN. 

Once I connect to my VPN, it bypasses my local DNS servers and tries to send ALL dns requests over the VPN causing an external lookup for an internal server.

Everything resolves fine via IP address on both local and remote but hostname resolution is what gives me an issue depending on what I set for DNS in the advanced tab.

Just to rule out my configuration.. Here's pictures of how its configured.

Hi Jaesii,

that's not an UTM issue, that's a Windows Issue. Unfortunately, Windows VPN is not able to do "Split-DNS".

Windows use every time the dns server that is bound to the first active adapter. You can change the binding order but you never can resolve local and remote names over vpn at the same time. That's one of the biggest issues that Microsoft ignores since many years. I've not found any working solution for this behavior yet.

regards

mod

It's indeed a Windows "issue"....

When you are physically at the location you are VPN-ing to, can you from there ping the VPN-names of the "local" side (I guess not otherwise you wouldn't need the VPN-connection).

There are actually only 3 solutions which all require manual work:

1) Add records for the remotely needed DNS-records to your local DNS-server
2) The other way around as 1
3) Add records in you local computer's HOSTS file

If there is a possibility to build a site-to-site VPN connection between the 2 locations, then you can configure DNS conditional forwarders in one or both of the DNS-servers and no manual work is needed.