This discussion has been locked.

You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Need to masquerade for SSL VPN

Hi,

the only way I can get SSL VPN working is by masqerading the VPN SSL Pool to the internal network. If I don't enable this the SSL VPN connects fine, but no traffic is being routed to the internal network (which is specified on local networks tab in the SSL VPN config). Any idea why I must do this? IS it because I've to NIC on the internal side of the ASL (one to the DMZ and one to the internal network)?

Franc.

This thread was automatically locked due to age.

Parents

0 BAlfson over 16 years ago

Please show a pic of your 'Remote Access >> SSL' 'Global' tab. Also of the related packet filter rules if you aren't using 'Automatic packet filter rules'.

Sophos UTM Community Moderator
Sophos Certified Architect - UTM
Sophos Certified Engineer - XG
Gold Solution Partner since 2005

MediaSoft, Inc. USA
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
0 FrancWest over 16 years ago in reply to BAlfson

On the global tab the following is specified:

users and groups:

only one account, my account

local networks:

internal network (network)

Automatic packet filter rules is checked.

Franc.
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
0 BAlfson over 16 years ago in reply to FrancWest

Are you sure the 'VPN Pool (SSL)' is disjoint from the 'Internal (Network)' subnet?

Sophos UTM Community Moderator
Sophos Certified Architect - UTM
Sophos Certified Engineer - XG
Gold Solution Partner since 2005

MediaSoft, Inc. USA
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
0 FrancWest over 16 years ago in reply to BAlfson

Hmmm, now I look at it, could this be the problem:

internal network is set to: 10.1.0.0/16

VPN Pool (SSL) is set to: 10.242.2.0/24
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
0 BarryG over 16 years ago in reply to FrancWest

Yes. The Pool must be a separate network.
You can change the Pool in Definitions - Networks.

Barry
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
0 BAlfson over 16 years ago in reply to BarryG

Barry, aren't those already disjoint? That shouldn't be a problem for him, should it?

Thanks - Bob

Sophos UTM Community Moderator
Sophos Certified Architect - UTM
Sophos Certified Engineer - XG
Gold Solution Partner since 2005

MediaSoft, Inc. USA
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
0 FrancWest over 16 years ago in reply to BAlfson

Hi,

coorect me if I'm wrong but when looking at the subnet masks aren't they already separate networks?

When searching the forum, I read that more people need to setup a masq rule in order to get things going. Wondering if this is standard practice.

Franc.
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
0 BarryG over 16 years ago in reply to BAlfson

Oops, Bob you're right.

Barry
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel

Reply

0 BarryG over 16 years ago in reply to BAlfson

Oops, Bob you're right.

Barry
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel

Children

No Data