Thread Info
  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 2 replies
  • Subscribers 1 subscriber
  • Views 444 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Site-to-Site SSL Stability?

BStillwell
Having long drop windows.....

2 ASG320's in Active/Passive Mode, multiple 120's (latest 4 port model).

Worked fine with IPSec - Installed 7.400 and changed IPSec to SSL.  Nice job on flexibility, very easy to setup, but the tunnel is randomly dropping and generally slow.

Can anyone offer any feedback/experience?  Thanks

Ben


This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • 0
    Why changing ipsec to ssl site to site? Would leave as it is. Only using ssl site to site when ipsec is not possible.

    Astaro user since 2001 - Astaro/Sophos Partner since 2008

  • 0 in reply to maygyver
    Right, I too am curious about the motivation to change to SSL.  I thought that IPSec was faster and more secure, but I don't know that for a fact.

    Thanks - Bob
     
    Sophos UTM Community Moderator
    Sophos Certified Architect - UTM
    Sophos Certified Engineer - XG
    Gold Solution Partner since 2005
    MediaSoft, Inc. USA
Reply
  • 0 in reply to maygyver
    Right, I too am curious about the motivation to change to SSL.  I thought that IPSec was faster and more secure, but I don't know that for a fact.

    Thanks - Bob
     
    Sophos UTM Community Moderator
    Sophos Certified Architect - UTM
    Sophos Certified Engineer - XG
    Gold Solution Partner since 2005
    MediaSoft, Inc. USA
Children
No Data
Cookie Information Banner