I have a IPSec connection with a Pre-Shared KEY (PSK), I set it up with roadwarrior, but then it only lets in my computer with SSH sentinel, The others setup their computers just the same with SSH Sentinel, but they cant connect. So Then I changed the setting from IPSec roadwarrior to Standard, but then even I cant connect to the IPSec connection. Any Ideas?!
Log after change:
May 7 02:53:28 (none) pluto[30487]: "techotel_2"[4] 193.217.160.xxx #1580: Peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: '0.0.0.0'
May 7 02:53:28 (none) pluto[30487]: "techotel_2"[4] 193.217.160.xxx #1580: sending notification INVALID_ID_INFORMATION to 193.217.160.xxx:500
May 7 02:53:28 (none) pluto[30487]: "techotel_2"[4] 193.217.160.xxx #1580: we require peer to have ID '193.217.160.xxx', but peer declares '0.0.0.0'
May 7 02:54:22 (none) pluto[30487]: "techotel_2"[4] 193.217.160.xxx #1578: max number of retransmissions (2) reached STATE_MAIN_I3. Possible authentication failure: no acceptable response to our first encrypted message
May 7 02:54:22 (none) pluto[30487]: "techotel_2"[4] 193.217.160.xxx #1578: starting keying attempt 200 of an unlimited number
May 7 02:54:22 (none) pluto[30487]: "techotel_2"[4] 193.217.160.xxx #1579: max number of retransmissions (2) reached STATE_MAIN_I3. Possible authentication failure: no acceptable response to our first encrypted message
May 7 02:54:22 (none) pluto[30487]: "techotel_2"[4] 193.217.160.xxx #1579: starting keying attempt 323 of an unlimited number
May 7 02:54:22 (none) pluto[30487]: "techotel_2"[4] 193.217.160.xxx #1584: Peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: '0.0.0.0'
May 7 02:54:22 (none) pluto[30487]: "techotel_2"[4] 193.217.160.xxx #1584: ignoring Vendor ID payload [SSH Communications Security IPSEC Express version 4.1.0]
May 7 02:54:22 (none) pluto[30487]: "techotel_2"[4] 193.217.160.xxx #1584: initiating Main Mode to replace #1578
May 7 02:54:22 (none) pluto[30487]: "techotel_2"[4] 193.217.160.xxx #1584: multiple ipsec.secrets entries with distinct secrets match endpoints: first secret used
May 7 02:54:22 (none) pluto[30487]: "techotel_2"[4] 193.217.160.xxx #1584: multiple ipsec.secrets entries with distinct secrets match endpoints: first secret used
May 7 02:54:22 (none) pluto[30487]: "techotel_2"[4] 193.217.160.xxx #1584: sending notification INVALID_ID_INFORMATION to 193.217.160.xxx:500
May 7 02:54:22 (none) pluto[30487]: "techotel_2"[4] 193.217.160.xxx #1584: we require peer to have ID '193.217.160.xxx', but peer declares '0.0.0.0'
May 7 02:54:22 (none) pluto[30487]: "techotel_2"[4] 193.217.160.xxx #1585: Peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: '0.0.0.0'
May 7 02:54:22 (none) pluto[30487]: "techotel_2"[4] 193.217.160.xxx #1585: ignoring Vendor ID payload [SSH Communications Security IPSEC Express version 4.1.0]
May 7 02:54:22 (none) pluto[30487]: "techotel_2"[4] 193.217.160.xxx #1585: initiating Main Mode to replace #1579
May 7 02:54:22 (none) pluto[30487]: "techotel_2"[4] 193.217.160.xxx #1585: multiple ipsec.secrets entries with distinct secrets match endpoints: first secret used
May 7 02:54:22 (none) pluto[30487]: "techotel_2"[4] 193.217.160.xxx #1585: multiple ipsec.secrets entries with distinct secrets match endpoints: first secret used
May 7 02:54:22 (none) pluto[30487]: "techotel_2"[4] 193.217.160.xxx #1585: we require peer to have ID '193.217.160.xxx', but peer declares '0.0.0.0'
Cheers kevin...
This thread was automatically locked due to age.
