This discussion has been locked.

You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

CA Management Error

When I enter the 'CA Management' i got error in my browser after 3.211 update:
"Line 141, char:1, object expected, Code: 0"

What it this. Now I can't do ANY changes on the management page !!!!

[:S]

This thread was automatically locked due to age.

Parents

0 LoosInt over 22 years ago

Hello,

i have the same problem, no management is possible via the Webinterface in the CA Management Window.
It seems the the window does'nt respond when i choose an item (such as delete, download as... etc.)

Version 3.211

Greetings
Thomas

[size="1"][ 11 November 2002, 05:26: Message edited by: LoosInt ][/size]
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
0 oliver.desch over 22 years ago in reply to LoosInt

Hello,

there is an java script error in the new webadmin.
The bugfix is under testing right now!

Thanks for patience
o|iver
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
0 ECKEROTH over 22 years ago in reply to oliver.desch

Oliver.

Thanks for the quick reply
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
0 DV_Kaschke over 22 years ago in reply to ECKEROTH

Has the javaproblem been solved in the update 3.212? I'm now working with 3.210 and not sure if it makes sense to install 3.211 and 3.212 - if this problem is not solved yet I will wait for a further update. What's the actual state? [:S]
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel

Reply

0 DV_Kaschke over 22 years ago in reply to ECKEROTH

Has the javaproblem been solved in the update 3.212? I'm now working with 3.210 and not sure if it makes sense to install 3.211 and 3.212 - if this problem is not solved yet I will wait for a further update. What's the actual state? [:S]
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel

Children

0 LoosInt over 22 years ago in reply to DV_Kaschke

after an update to 3.212 everything
in the CA Management works fine.

Greetings
Thomas
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
0 oliver.desch over 22 years ago in reply to LoosInt

DV_kaschke,

it really makes sense - the current bind vulnerable
is fixed as well!

read you
o|iver
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel