Hi everyone,
First time user having just received my SG 135 :)
I have the following Client situation:
They are an Office of up to 24 staff running windows laptops, no servers, everything is done via hosted Exchange and Autotask Workplace File Sync and Share.
We will be installing a 400/400 Fibre connection in a month or so.
Once installed I'm intending to install the following:
1) Sophos 135 SG with Network Protection only.
2) Hosted PABx System from https://www.telecube.com.au/hosted-pabx/
3) 24 Yealink SIP handsets.
On my test setup I've set up the following:
1) Main Subnet port which goes to a dumb switch, for all the computers, iphones, backup synology etc.
2) Voip LAN port on a different subnet, which goes to another dumb switch, for all the headsets.
I was thinking there must be a way to prioritise the Voip port, ie:
Allocate say 20/20 Mbps of the 400/400 to voip, this port has absolute priority over everything else, ie:
The main subnet would get the remaining 380/380.
However, according to Sophos support this is not possible?
"QoS is to set different priority to different network traffic.
In your scenario, you should give high priority to traffic between SIP handset and Telecub's PABX, not the LAN4 VoIP interface on UTM.
Traffic Selectors defines different network traffic. Therefore, the IP address of Telecub's PABX server should be defined as Source of Traffic Selectors"
and instead referred me to a QOS for VOIP traffic.docx, see link below.
https://us.awp.autotask.net/1/filelink/bv2my-b3pysuq-wtr5bcbv
and which they said:
Please refer to the attached QoS for VoIP traffic.docx for configuration.
QoS for VoIP traffic.docx is for VoIP scenario with external SIP provider (SIP locates on Internet).
If you have a different scenario, please let me know
1. IP address of SIP server
2. IP address of internal PBX server, if any
3. IP address of a VoIP phone/client device
I'm just a bit concerned about putting all the traffic on the one subnet and relying on QOS to ensure voip is perfect.
Plus that document seemed a bit cumbersome to me, in that I'd have to set up each individual handset?
Love to hear what you think.
Best wishes, Martin
This thread was automatically locked due to age.