Network Protection: Firewall, NAT, QoS, & IPS Subnet Mask for Additional Addresses

UTM Firewall requires membership for participation - click to join

Thread Info

State Not Answered
Locked Locked
Replies 6 replies
Subscribers 2 subscribers
Views 2517 views
Users 0 members are here

Options

Suggested

This discussion has been locked.

You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Subnet Mask for Additional Addresses

ahargrove over 10 years ago

Is it incorrect to use a /32 mask when defining additional addresses on an interface?

This thread was automatically locked due to age.

Parents

0 ahargrove over 10 years ago

But, would you do it during production or schedule a maintenance window? [:)]
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel

Reply

0 ahargrove over 10 years ago

But, would you do it during production or schedule a maintenance window? [:)]
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel

Children

No Data