Thread Info
  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 6 replies
  • Subscribers 2 subscribers
  • Views 2554 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Subnet Mask for Additional Addresses

ahargrove
Is it incorrect to use a /32 mask when defining additional addresses on an interface?


This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • 0
    No, that is how you are supposed to do it.  Using a smaller subnet mask can result in false alarms on the anti-spoofing system, etc.

    CTO, Convergent Information Security Solutions, LLC

    https://www.convergesecurity.com

    Advice given as posted on this forum does not construe a support relationship or other relationship with Convergent Information Security Solutions, LLC or its subsidiaries.  Use the advice given at your own risk.

Reply
  • 0
    No, that is how you are supposed to do it.  Using a smaller subnet mask can result in false alarms on the anti-spoofing system, etc.

    CTO, Convergent Information Security Solutions, LLC

    https://www.convergesecurity.com

    Advice given as posted on this forum does not construe a support relationship or other relationship with Convergent Information Security Solutions, LLC or its subsidiaries.  Use the advice given at your own risk.

Children
No Data
Cookie Information Banner