Yes. However, in all my previous 9.x versions the FW tab and NAT tab had their own set of sequenced numbers (FW#1, FW#2, etc. then NAT#1, NAT#2, etc.). In my current version, rule #1 starts under the NAT tab and continues the sequence through the FW tab (NAT#1, NAT#2, NAT#3, FW#4, FW#5, FW#6). Just a bit annoying since I had most of my rules memorized by number. Although, it does kind of make a bit more sense since now the NAT automatic FW rule is accounted for in the numbering sequence.
That is not correct. The nat rules have their own sequence eg I have two masq and 4 dnat rules. The dnat rules are 1 to 4, the firewall rules associated are 1 to 3. All dnat rules have auto packet filter ticked.
That is not correct. The nat rules have their own sequence eg I have two masq and 4 dnat rules. The dnat rules are 1 to 4, the firewall rules associated are 1 to 3. All dnat rules have auto packet filter ticked.
That is not correct. The nat rules have their own sequence eg I have two masq and 4 dnat rules. The dnat rules are 1 to 4, the firewall rules associated are 1 to 3. All dnat rules have auto packet filter ticked.
Ian
Well what I described is the way it is (for my UTM) after upgrading to 9.202-33.[8-)]
