Thread Info
  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 10 replies
  • Subscribers 2 subscribers
  • Views 2922 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Heartbleed IPS rules found here

SalishSwede
If my memory serves me, once upon a time, Astaro allowed the creation of customer rules for the IPS.  No more.

This link contains the details of IPS rules for Heartbleed. 
Can we please get this implemented ASAP.

And can we open back up the ability to manage/create custom rules?

Heartbleed OpenSSL vulnerability: A technical remediation


This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • 0
    I don't think machines protected by WAF should be in Danger, should they? After all, an attacker would talk to the UTM (which has the fix) and not the server.

    DNAT would offer not protection though, so for those machines a rule would be very much appreciated.
Reply
  • 0
    I don't think machines protected by WAF should be in Danger, should they? After all, an attacker would talk to the UTM (which has the fix) and not the server.

    DNAT would offer not protection though, so for those machines a rule would be very much appreciated.
Children
No Data