This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Server Loadbalancing from internal to internal

Hi,

i have a question on using Server Load Balancing only for the internal interface.

scenario:

https server on 
- 192.168.100.1
- 192.168.100.2

Firewall IP internal:
- 192.168.100.254

virtual IP for Loadbalancing:

- 192.168.100.10

All machines have set the UTM as default gateway.
The Userportal was moved from ANY Interface to only external!

So the steps in the setup are easy, but why i cannot reach the service?

It works great on both hosts, but not on the virtual IP.

(what i wanna do is loadbalancing to internal exchange servers.)

In the firewalllog is no entry ....


This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • Is the "virtual IP" defined as additional address on your UTM? Otherwise your clients will not be able to reach this IP because it doesn't exist in your internal network...

    ----------
    Sophos user, admin and reseller.
    Private Setup:

    • XG: HPE DL20 Gen9 (Core i3-7300, 8GB RAM, 120GB SSD) | XG 18.0 (Home License) with: Web Protection, Site-to-Site-VPN (IPSec, RED-Tunnel), Remote Access (SSL, HTML5)
    • UTM: 2 vCPUs, 2GB RAM, 50GB vHDD, 2 vNICs on vServer (KVM) | UTM 9.7 (Home License) with: Email Protection, Webserver Protection, RED-Tunnel (server)
Reply
  • Is the "virtual IP" defined as additional address on your UTM? Otherwise your clients will not be able to reach this IP because it doesn't exist in your internal network...

    ----------
    Sophos user, admin and reseller.
    Private Setup:

    • XG: HPE DL20 Gen9 (Core i3-7300, 8GB RAM, 120GB SSD) | XG 18.0 (Home License) with: Web Protection, Site-to-Site-VPN (IPSec, RED-Tunnel), Remote Access (SSL, HTML5)
    • UTM: 2 vCPUs, 2GB RAM, 50GB vHDD, 2 vNICs on vServer (KVM) | UTM 9.7 (Home License) with: Email Protection, Webserver Protection, RED-Tunnel (server)
Children
No Data