Thread Info
  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 1 reply
  • Subscribers 2 subscribers
  • Views 297 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Separate bridged and routed networks in the same ASL 6.300 box?

ElJefe
Is it possible to handle two separate networks, one in a standard routed, masqueraded mode and another in a transparent bridged mode within the same ASL box?

I have two public address blocks. A /28 subnet and a /27 subnet coming from different class A number blocks. The /28 I am using in a standard routed, masquerade config with a bunch of machines running on 10.0.x.x/24 network. The other block, the public /27 I need to run as bridged, transparent and put a set of public servers (www, ftp, ssh, etc) and I want to be able to packet filter traffic on that bridge.

I have a very robust server acting as the ASL 6.300 system. Can I run eth0 and eth1 in the standard routed/masqueraded mode and add an eth2 and eth3 and run them as a transparent bridge for the other network? Is there any risk of traffic being routed or passed between the bridge and the routerd/masqueraded network?

Thanks!


This thread was automatically locked due to age.