Thread Info
  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 2 replies
  • Subscribers 2 subscribers
  • Views 562 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Strange behaviour with policy routes...

jocki
We are using sw-version 6.001 on a 220 appliance.

We have about 16 policy routes defined, but only the first ten get active. When we relocate entries above the 11th definition it works, but all rules behind the 10th won't work...

Is there a limitation? Technical or by License?

Could anyone clarify?


This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • 0
    ID2933 6.001 Policy routes have wrong sort order for more then 9 routes
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Description: When adding more than 9 policy routes, the sort order is
                 alphabetically but not numerically.
    Workaround:  ---
    Fix:         Fixed in 6.003

    -> http://www.astaro.com/lists/Known_Issues-ASL-V6.txt
  • 0 in reply to ClausP
    Thank you for this hint. But what has a wrong sort order to do with inactive policy routes? There are no conflicts/duplicates in our policy routes which could match before. Or are there implicit policy routes not seen in the configuration?

    And one more general question: Are those updates free?
Reply
  • 0 in reply to ClausP
    Thank you for this hint. But what has a wrong sort order to do with inactive policy routes? There are no conflicts/duplicates in our policy routes which could match before. Or are there implicit policy routes not seen in the configuration?

    And one more general question: Are those updates free?
Children
No Data