Thread Info
  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 14 replies
  • Subscribers 2 subscribers
  • Views 3017 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Why do I require a NAT rule to get 443 through the

RFCat_vk_01
firewall?
For a little while today I was able to get 443 through the firewall without a NAT rule. I did install real IP addresses on the LAN side of the firewall so that I didn't need another NAT rule. I have 3 devices that do NAT, tomorrow it will be down to 2 and if I can get an answer to this maybe down to one.

Ian M
 [:S]


This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • 0
    [ QUOTE ]
    firewall?
    For a little while today I was able to get 443 through the firewall without a NAT rule. I did install real IP addresses on the LAN side of the firewall so that I didn't need another NAT rule. I have 3 devices that do NAT, tomorrow it will be down to 2 and if I can get an answer to this maybe down to one.

    Ian M
     [:S] 

    [/ QUOTE ]
    HTTPS can only be proxied in normal mode.  in transparent mode the http proxy only does http(80).  Is your http proxy in normal or transparent mode?
  • 0 in reply to William Warren
    Thank you, question answered.

    Ian M [:)]
Reply Children
No Data