Hello,
we had to re-image a customers dead UTM node because of file system errors. That was successful and pretty painless (love the automatic up2date function for the new slave in autoconfig).
Now I'm wondering why we see such a big difference in used disk space in "log" and "data" between the old master and the new slave node:
Sophos UTM HA Log sync.png
Looks to me like the logs have not been copied over from master to slave, shouldn't that happen automatically?
Thanks and best regards,
SA
This thread was automatically locked due to age.