Guest User!

You are not Sophos Staff.

Thread Info
  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 4 replies
  • Subscribers 2 subscribers
  • Views 1931 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Dead node reimaging - Log files?

SmallAdmin
Hello,
we had to re-image a customers dead UTM node because of file system errors. That was successful and pretty painless (love the automatic up2date function for the new slave in autoconfig).

Now I'm wondering why we see such a big difference in used disk space in "log" and "data" between the old master and the new slave node:

Sophos UTM HA Log sync.png

Looks to me like the logs have not been copied over from master to slave, shouldn't that happen automatically?

Thanks and best regards,
SA


This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents Reply Children
  • 0 in reply to Scott_Klassen
    It could possible be due to temp file differences.  Does the status show as syncing? 

    Yes, the status is OK and syncing.

    It's a little odd that the SWAP sizes are different, which closely equals the difference in size that you see in the partition sizes.

    Yes, they have definitely changed something in the partitioning scheme starting with 9.3+

    Maybe I should try a manual node switch to check the log files. [:)]
Share Feedback
×

Submitted a Tech Support Case lately from the Support Portal?