i have update an old UTM from V9. to V9.105-9. Now i've the following problem with DHCP and Option66 when this option is text with "yxzhost:12345/something". We need this option to auto-provide settings to voip-telephones. There was no problem with the old V9-UTM. The V9.105-9 UTM create illegal dhcpd.conf entries an the dhcp-server on the UTM is exiting. It doesn't matter if we use the updated config or create a new DHCP-Option66 with "http" in text.
The config with two Option66s and http://... give the following log:
2013:09:30-19:54:41 xyzhost dhcpd: /etc/dhcpd.conf line 57: semicolon expected.
2013:09:30-19:54:41 xyzhost dhcpd: next-server http:
2013:09:30-19:54:41 xyzhost dhcpd: ^
2013:09:30-19:54:41 xyzhost dhcpd: /etc/dhcpd.conf line 57: expecting a parameter or declaration
2013:09:30-19:54:41 xyzhost dhcpd: next-server http://hostip:50080/ap/snom/;
2013:09:30-19:54:41 xyzhost dhcpd: ^
2013:09:30-19:54:41 xyzhost dhcpd: /etc/dhcpd.conf line 76: semicolon expected.
2013:09:30-19:54:41 xyzhost dhcpd: next-server http:
2013:09:30-19:54:41 xyzhost dhcpd: ^
2013:09:30-19:54:41 xyzhost dhcpd: /etc/dhcpd.conf line 76: expecting a parameter or declaration
2013:09:30-19:54:41 xyzhost dhcpd: next-server http://hostip:50080/ap/aastra/;
2013:09:30-19:54:41 xyzhost dhcpd: ^
2013:09:30-19:54:41 xyzhost dhcpd: /etc/dhcpd.conf line 79: group declarations not allowed here.
2013:09:30-19:54:41 xyzhost dhcpd: group
2013:09:30-19:54:41 xyzhost dhcpd: ^
2013:09:30-19:54:41 xyzhost dhcpd: /etc/dhcpd.conf line 102: unexpected end of file
2013:09:30-19:54:41 xyzhost dhcpd:
2013:09:30-19:54:41 xyzhost dhcpd: ^
2013:09:30-19:54:41 xyzhost dhcpd: Configuration file errors encountered -- exiting
Every Option66 creates the wrong line: "next-server http:" in the config file. This line is an unnecessary extra line with no function. When disabling one of these Option66 the addional line and the right line is deleted from dhcpd.conf. This shows me that this isn't an old forgotten line in the config. The middleware creates these wrong lines.
How to get this thing running? Is this a bug or is there a change in the GUI that this entries has to be entered in another syntax?
greets
silent
This thread was automatically locked due to age.