This discussion has been locked.

You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Bonding/Teaming Lan

Hi,

I have to implement a net with the following specs.
LAN with about 70+ clients and a dmz with 2 servers and astaro sry. sophos as the gateway for all of them + all subscriptions except MAIL will be active.

Does it makes sense or is a there a benefit if I activate bonding on the LAN side?
I ask in general and implicit for a performance boost to the internal servers (smb, etc.) ?

This thread was automatically locked due to age.

Parents

0 esmirQ over 12 years ago

Cheers!

Regarding to this I try to figure out the best way to connect 3 x 48 port switches for my lan.
If possible I wont manage them because I want to do everything on my astaro box And to redice administraton. But If I just connect them unmanaged with a cat7 cable It will loop and the last switch is the bottle neck right? So I thought to LAG my Lan (astaro) and connect one to switch 1 and the other to switch 3 !?
Or is it necessary to manage them all (switches) and trunk between and eg. additional LAG on astaro to 2 of them?

What do you think - What's the common way?
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel

Reply

0 esmirQ over 12 years ago

Cheers!

Regarding to this I try to figure out the best way to connect 3 x 48 port switches for my lan.
If possible I wont manage them because I want to do everything on my astaro box And to redice administraton. But If I just connect them unmanaged with a cat7 cable It will loop and the last switch is the bottle neck right? So I thought to LAG my Lan (astaro) and connect one to switch 1 and the other to switch 3 !?
Or is it necessary to manage them all (switches) and trunk between and eg. additional LAG on astaro to 2 of them?

What do you think - What's the common way?
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel

Children

No Data