This discussion has been locked.

You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

[7.009] Message is unknown to the spam scanner

Hi,
I was happy to hear that with 7.008 there will be a new spam engine
which hopefully detects more spam, but after upgrading this evening
and waiting some minutes I got this mail:

Received: from [12.105.135.72] by mxs.perenter.com with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 21:49:46 +0400

Message-ID: 

Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 19:40:28 +0200

Reply-To: "Sara" 

From: "Sara" 

User-Agent: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; U)

MIME-Version: 1.0

To: "Alexander" 

Subject: Hut ab, diese Preise sind unschlagbar

Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="------------761706045368733605415526"

X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A0B0203.46EAC74F.018C,ss=1,fgs=0

X-cff-SpamScore: 0(/)

X-cff-SpamReport: ----- ----- Message is unknown to the spam scanner.

X-cff-LastScanner: av

Anyone the same effect?

cu SveN

This thread was automatically locked due to age.

Parents

0 Mike_H over 18 years ago

SveN

Please look at https://community.sophos.com/products/unified-threat-management/astaroorg/f/56/t/48124

Not sure if it will help
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
0 SveN_01 over 18 years ago in reply to Mike_H

SveN

Please look at http://www.astaro.org/showthread.php?t=19407

Not sure if it will help

Thanks for your reply, but that didn't help :-)

I don't see a reason why the mail I posted above
should not be detected as spam....

cu SveN
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
0 thtran over 18 years ago in reply to SveN_01

It's not detected as spam, because the new spam-scanner also is not perfect. Or did you really expect it to detect 100% of all spam?
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel
0 SveN_01 over 18 years ago in reply to thtran

It's not detected as spam, because the new spam-scanner also is not perfect.

That's what I am talking about
Or did you really expect it to detect 100% of all spam?

No I didn't! But according to Gert's Post
I would have expected it to be better than in ASL 7.007....
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel

Reply

0 SveN_01 over 18 years ago in reply to thtran

It's not detected as spam, because the new spam-scanner also is not perfect.

That's what I am talking about
Or did you really expect it to detect 100% of all spam?

No I didn't! But according to Gert's Post
I would have expected it to be better than in ASL 7.007....
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel

Children

No Data