Thread Info
  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 2 replies
  • Subscribers 1 subscriber
  • Views 657 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Spam filter: Why isn't 10.3 > 10?

Duke_01
Hi, 

I just found the lines below in my SMTP log file. It says the mail has a spam-score of 10.3, and it says this has triggered  threshold1. However, I have set threshold 2 to 10, so it appears as it doesn't realize that 10.3 is greater than 10. This looks like a bug to me. Can anyone confirm this? I'm running 5.023.

Sascha


[ QUOTE ]
2004:09:28-15:30:08 gate exim[16600]: 2004-09-28 15:30:08 1CCI3T-0004Jk-10 H=(...) [...] Warning: spam_score:10.3
2004:09:28-15:30:08 gate exim[16600]: 2004-09-28 15:30:08 1CCI3T-0004Jk-10 H=(...) [...] Warning:  spam_threshold1  triggered

[/ QUOTE ]


This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • 0
    What is your threshold1? And the actions for those thresholds?

    Since I have threshold1 set to 2 (warn) and threshold2 set to 4 (reject), I will see things like this:

    2004:09:28-00:48:19 (none) exim[13147]: 2004-09-28 00:48:19 1CC3M0-0003Q3-Sd H=(host140-80.pool8250.interbusiness.it) [82.50.80.140] Warning: spam_score:6.4
    2004:09:28-00:48:19 (none) exim[13147]: 2004-09-28 00:48:19 1CC3M0-0003Q3-Sd H=(host140-80.pool8250.interbusiness.it) [82.50.80.140] Warning: spam_threshold1 triggered
    2004:09:28-00:48:19 (none) exim[13147]: 2004-09-28 00:48:19 1CC3M0-0003Q3-Sd H=(host140-80.pool8250.interbusiness.it) [82.50.80.140] F= rejected after DATA: spam_threshold2 triggered
    2004:09:28-00:48:19 (none) exim[13147]: [1\32] 2004-09-28 00:48:19 1CC3M0-0003Q3-Sd H=(host140-80.pool8250.interbusiness.it) [82.50.80.140] F= rejected after DATA: spam_threshold2 triggered
  • 0 in reply to MagicMike
    Hmm, you're right. After looking at the log file again, there it says that threshold 2 was triggered and the mail was rejected. I could have sworn though that when I saw this yesterday, it wasn't there. Anyway, thanks for the tip.

    Sascha
Reply
  • 0 in reply to MagicMike
    Hmm, you're right. After looking at the log file again, there it says that threshold 2 was triggered and the mail was rejected. I could have sworn though that when I saw this yesterday, it wasn't there. Anyway, thanks for the tip.

    Sascha
Children
No Data
Cookie Information Banner