Guest User!

You are not Sophos Staff.

Thread Info
  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 3 replies
  • Subscribers 4 subscribers
  • Views 3939 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

To which UTM appliance the following hardware is similar and are the performances also similar?

N0PT4U

Atom Rangley 8 cores C2758 (SUPERMICRO A1SRi-2758F), 8GB RAM, SSD SATAIII 256GB, SOPHOS UTM9 HOME FREE.

If the sophos will be virtualized on a bare metal VMWARE ESXI 5.5 installed on the hardware above, and will be the only VM, how much the virtualisation will affect performances?



This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • 0
    You can find the datasheet for SG appliances at www.sophos.com/.../sophos-sg-series-appliances-brna.pdf, to do a comparison. With the UTM being the only VM, the only thing that may affect the performance, will be the amount of memory that has to be used by the Hypervisor.
    __________________
    ACE v8/SCA v9.3

    ...still have a v5 install disk in a box somewhere.

    http://xkcd.com
    http://www.tedgoff.com/mb
    http://www.projectcartoon.com/cartoon/1
  • 0 in reply to Scott_Klassen
    Hello, thanks again for your answer.

    I think the appliances have the following CPUs:

    SG-210 : Celeron® G1820 has a speed of 2.70 GHz (probable match for SG-210)
    SG-230 : Pentium® Processor G3420 has a speed of 3.20 GHz (probable match for SG-230)
    SG-310 : is a Intel® Core™ i3-4330 Processor,
    SG-330 : probably is i5-4570S (sole quad i5-4th gen w/o HT and base speed of 2.9GHz)
    SG-430 : E3-1225 v3 has a turbo of 3.6GHz (probable match for SG-430)


    I would like to know if UTM9 software care more about the number of cores or if it's "more powerful" augmenting the clock. (more powerful=more users, more speed in processing IPS/IDS tasks etc)

    Basically : better 8 cores at 2.4Ghz or better 2/4 cores at 3.5Ghz?

    Thanks again for your feedback!
Reply
  • 0 in reply to Scott_Klassen
    Hello, thanks again for your answer.

    I think the appliances have the following CPUs:

    SG-210 : Celeron® G1820 has a speed of 2.70 GHz (probable match for SG-210)
    SG-230 : Pentium® Processor G3420 has a speed of 3.20 GHz (probable match for SG-230)
    SG-310 : is a Intel® Core™ i3-4330 Processor,
    SG-330 : probably is i5-4570S (sole quad i5-4th gen w/o HT and base speed of 2.9GHz)
    SG-430 : E3-1225 v3 has a turbo of 3.6GHz (probable match for SG-430)


    I would like to know if UTM9 software care more about the number of cores or if it's "more powerful" augmenting the clock. (more powerful=more users, more speed in processing IPS/IDS tasks etc)

    Basically : better 8 cores at 2.4Ghz or better 2/4 cores at 3.5Ghz?

    Thanks again for your feedback!
Children
No Data
Unfiltered HTML