This discussion has been locked.

You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Handling Tagged vlan packets

I'm trying to establish an enterprise wide vlan that spans several UTMs and switches. As I understand it, if I need to forward the tagged vlan packets, I need to create the same vlan on both physical interfaces, is that correct?

We already have a routed UTM infrastructure that we need to keep, linking different subnets together, but I also need to create a new sitewide lan (same subnet) for DCOM reasons. I'm suggesting to implement a sitewide vlan that sits ontop the existing physical lan, will that work on UTM?

For switches I use a trunk port, but UTM I'm unsure of the required config.

Thanks

This thread was automatically locked due to age.

Parents

0 Aoffield over 10 years ago

So I've looked at the interfaces and can only single VLANs that can be configured, it can't see how to create a trunk. I need an enterprise vlan that spans several UTMs, so how would I pass vlan (99)on eth3(10.0.17.x) to eth4(172.16.18.x)?

I need to keep the existing UTM config for routing various subnets for different departments, but I need a plantwide LAN via the same infrastructure, hence, the vlan. To me it seems I would need to bridge if I wanted tagged vlan traffic to egress the UTM?
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel

Reply

0 Aoffield over 10 years ago

So I've looked at the interfaces and can only single VLANs that can be configured, it can't see how to create a trunk. I need an enterprise vlan that spans several UTMs, so how would I pass vlan (99)on eth3(10.0.17.x) to eth4(172.16.18.x)?

I need to keep the existing UTM config for routing various subnets for different departments, but I need a plantwide LAN via the same infrastructure, hence, the vlan. To me it seems I would need to bridge if I wanted tagged vlan traffic to egress the UTM?
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel

Children

No Data