Thread Info
  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 2 replies
  • Subscribers 2 subscribers
  • Views 1183 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Regenerate Certs after 9.111-7 (Heartbleed Bugfix)

raffis
I guess new certs for remote access ssl vpn are a good idea, but: 

2014:04:10-12:41:01 fw001-1 confd[25007]: E Use of uninitialized value $enddate in pattern match (m//) at /Object/ca/signing_ca.pm line 359.

2014:04:10-12:41:01 fw001-1 confd[25007]:

2014:04:10-12:41:01 fw001-1 confd[25007]: 1. sys::_warn:52() /sys.pm

2014:04:10-12:41:01 fw001-1 confd[25007]: 2. Object::ca::signing_ca::ca_generate_signing_ca:359() /Object/ca/signing_ca.pm

2014:04:10-12:41:01 fw001-1 confd[25007]: 3. Object::ca::signing_ca::ca_regenerate_signing_ca:473() /Object/ca/signing_ca.pm

2014:04:10-12:41:01 fw001-1 confd[25007]: 4. (eval):1() (eval 3161)

2014:04:10-12:41:01 fw001-1 confd[25007]: 5. sys::AUTOLOAD:354() /sys.pm

2014:04:10-12:41:01 fw001-1 confd[25007]: 6. (eval):1() (eval 3159)

2014:04:10-12:41:01 fw001-1 confd[25007]: 7. Astaro::RPC::server_loop:198() /rpc.pm

2014:04:10-12:41:01 fw001-1 confd[25007]: 8. rpc::launch:50() /rpc.pm

2014:04:10-12:41:01 fw001-1 confd[25007]: 9. main::_rpc:2189() confd.pl

2014:04:10-12:41:01 fw001-1 confd[25007]: 10. main::top-level:394() confd.pl 



I get that if I submit the "Regenerate Signing CA" form.


Bug?


This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • 0
    Raffis,

    What do you experience that makes you consider this a problem?  Or, are you just saying that it looks like sloppy code that someone should clean up?  I think the latter is the case as I see the same in a log from a unit that went through this yesterday.

    Cheers - Bob
  • 0 in reply to BAlfson
    Raffis,

    What do you experience that makes you consider this a problem?  Or, are you just saying that it looks like sloppy code that someone should clean up?  I think the latter is the case as I see the same in a log from a unit that went through this yesterday.

    Cheers - Bob


    Argh^^ I didn't realized, that the ca regeneration was fine [:)]
    Because there was an error at the bottom: 
    "The Confd reported an error without providing any details. "


    But it is clearly a coding bug.
Reply
  • 0 in reply to BAlfson
    Raffis,

    What do you experience that makes you consider this a problem?  Or, are you just saying that it looks like sloppy code that someone should clean up?  I think the latter is the case as I see the same in a log from a unit that went through this yesterday.

    Cheers - Bob


    Argh^^ I didn't realized, that the ca regeneration was fine [:)]
    Because there was an error at the bottom: 
    "The Confd reported an error without providing any details. "


    But it is clearly a coding bug.
Children
No Data