Thread Info
  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 68 replies
  • Subscribers 2 subscribers
  • Views 28044 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

UTM 9.103 Soft-Released

GuyFawkes
Hi guys,
there is a new update on the FTP server [:)]
Has anyone installed this update? 

Up2Date information	

News

·		Bugfix Release

·		Fixed: Permission errors for auditor rules

·		Changed: Better adapt IPS configuration to machine capabilities

·		Changed: Notifications for Site-to-Site VPN and RED tunnels are separate

·		Changed: Wifi channel 165 is available in Taiwan 



Remarks

·		System will be rebooted

·		Configuration will be upgraded

·		Connected Wifi APs will perform firmware upgrade



Bugfixes

24922		after reboot syslogng was not started


Here is the link: ftp://ftp.astaro.com/UTM/v9/up2date/u2d-sys-9.102008-103005.tgz.gpg


Nice greetings


This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • 0
    first:  rpm -e ep-httpproxy

    Does this uninstall any rpm named 'ep-httpproxy'?

    Can someone comment on whether or not renaming '/var/up2date//sys-install/u2d-sys-9.103005/rpms/ep-httpproxy-9.10-70.gb848cab.i686.rpm' would have worked.

    Cheers - Bob
     
    Sophos UTM Community Moderator
    Sophos Certified Architect - UTM
    Sophos Certified Engineer - XG
    Gold Solution Partner since 2005
    MediaSoft, Inc. USA
Reply
  • 0
    first:  rpm -e ep-httpproxy

    Does this uninstall any rpm named 'ep-httpproxy'?

    Can someone comment on whether or not renaming '/var/up2date//sys-install/u2d-sys-9.103005/rpms/ep-httpproxy-9.10-70.gb848cab.i686.rpm' would have worked.

    Cheers - Bob
     
    Sophos UTM Community Moderator
    Sophos Certified Architect - UTM
    Sophos Certified Engineer - XG
    Gold Solution Partner since 2005
    MediaSoft, Inc. USA
Children
  • 0 in reply to BAlfson
    Does this uninstall any rpm named 'ep-httpproxy'?

    Can someone comment on whether or not renaming '/var/up2date//sys-install/u2d-sys-9.103005/rpms/ep-httpproxy-9.10-70.gb848cab.i686.rpm' would have worked.
    I was going to post the rpm -e method but was afraid since my rpm foo is a little rusty ever since I gave up on redhat a few years ago. I was actually hoping that one of the devs would let us know how to fix this. I don't understand how this stuff keeps on happening. Granted, the original http patch was not for general public and probably shouldn't have been posted as now we have 3 pages of stuff totally un-related to the actual bugs in soft release. More importantly it shouldn't have been installed blindly by everyone.

    But the fact remains ... Some dev that deals with httpproxy wrote the patch and named it to sophos internal numbering standard and somehow the rpm in the latest release completely forgot to match / check against that [:S] Hopefully they will fix the problem before the GA but idiotic mistakes like this deters users from testing soft releases in their environments. 

    I really like soft release system, but lets be real... its a soft release and not a beta release and should not be treated as such by sophos [:@]

    Regards
    Bill
Cookie Information Banner