Thread Info
  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 8 replies
  • Subscribers 2 subscribers
  • Views 2066 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Marvell 88E8053 ExpressCard

azmodan2k
Hi all,

I've bought this NIC Belkin F5U250 based on this thread https://community.sophos.com/products/unified-threat-management/astaroorg/f/52/t/28296 because this card works for the user.

Within setup of UTM9 the nic was detected and I'm able to select it as local ethernet nic but after rebooting the nic won't come up. After testing and research I've found that it works in v7 based on module sk98lin but this module was removed from v8 upwards ... the loaded sky2 module in UTM 9 won't work. Is there any chance to get the nic working? 

05:00.0 Ethernet controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88E8053 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 20)

        Subsystem: SysKonnect Device 4340

        Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B- DisINTx-

        Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- SERR+ 

        Capabilities: [5c] Message Signalled Interrupts: Mask- 64bit+ Count=1/2 Enable-

                Address: 0000000000000000  Data: 0000

        Capabilities: [e0] Express (v1) Legacy Endpoint, MSI 00

                DevCap: MaxPayload 128 bytes, PhantFunc 0, Latency L0s unlimited, L1 unlimited

                        ExtTag- AttnBtn- AttnInd- PwrInd- RBE- FLReset-

                DevCtl: Report errors: Correctable- Non-Fatal- Fatal- Unsupported-

                        RlxdOrd- ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop-

                        MaxPayload 128 bytes, MaxReadReq 2048 bytes

                DevSta: CorrErr+ UncorrErr+ FatalErr- UnsuppReq+ AuxPwr+ TransPend-

                LnkCap: Port #0, Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x1, ASPM L0s, Latency L0 


05:00.0 0200: 11ab:4362 (rev 20)

        Subsystem: 1148:4340

        Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B- DisINTx-

        Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- SERR+ 

        Capabilities: [5c] Message Signalled Interrupts: Mask- 64bit+ Count=1/2 Enable-

                Address: 0000000000000000  Data: 0000

        Capabilities: [e0] Express (v1) Legacy Endpoint, MSI 00

                DevCap: MaxPayload 128 bytes, PhantFunc 0, Latency L0s unlimited, L1 unlimited

                        ExtTag- AttnBtn- AttnInd- PwrInd- RBE- FLReset-

                DevCtl: Report errors: Correctable- Non-Fatal- Fatal- Unsupported-

                        RlxdOrd- ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop-

                        MaxPayload 128 bytes, MaxReadReq 2048 bytes

                DevSta: CorrErr+ UncorrErr+ FatalErr- UnsuppReq+ AuxPwr+ TransPend-

                LnkCap: Port #0, Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x1, ASPM L0s, Latency L0 


thanks in advance


This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Parents
  • 0
    For what its worth, I agree with William, Marvel chipsets can be problematic, though I also generally avoid Broadcom stuff because of issues I've seen on other platforms.. If you can find it / afford it, Intel NICs are normally a safer bet.

    CTO, Convergent Information Security Solutions, LLC

    https://www.convergesecurity.com

    Advice given as posted on this forum does not construe a support relationship or other relationship with Convergent Information Security Solutions, LLC or its subsidiaries.  Use the advice given at your own risk.

Reply
  • 0
    For what its worth, I agree with William, Marvel chipsets can be problematic, though I also generally avoid Broadcom stuff because of issues I've seen on other platforms.. If you can find it / afford it, Intel NICs are normally a safer bet.

    CTO, Convergent Information Security Solutions, LLC

    https://www.convergesecurity.com

    Advice given as posted on this forum does not construe a support relationship or other relationship with Convergent Information Security Solutions, LLC or its subsidiaries.  Use the advice given at your own risk.

Children
No Data
Cookie Information Banner